Synopsis:
Carell plays Dan, an advice column
writer who is also a single father of three girls. Dan packs up his
daughters and heads away for the weekend to an annual family retreat. Dan
has been single for four years and meeting women just isn't his thing. His
first morning on the retreat, he meets a beautiful woman named Annie (played by
Juliette Binoche). Dan & Annie hit it off, but their chance encounter
fades as Annie has to be going. Little is Dan to know, but Annie turns out
to be heading to Dan's retreat as well, since she is the girlfriend of Dan's
brother (Dane Cook). The film follows Dan through the heartache of finding
the right girl, only to see she is with someone else.
The Freak's Rating: B- :
As most people in America are, I am a
fan of The Office. I've been a fan of Steve Carell since he was on The
Daily Show as perhaps the best news correspondent ever on television. I
try to completely distance myself from everything when I start a movie.
After a stern warning from Lori, I made sure I did
so with Dan In Real Life.
Dan In Real Life is heartbreakingly
honest in many moments. Carell is good at making you feel his pain.
He pulls off this dramatic role just as well as he did in
Little Miss Sunshine. Dane Cook is
adequate as Dan's brother, Binoche is good and the remainder of the cast holds
up their end of the bargain as well. The serious, and I mean SERIOUS let
down is the writing, specifically the ending of the film. This movie was
an A for me all the way until the last 10 minutes. If you've ever heard
the term "tacked on" or "canned" as a way to describe the ending to a film, but
never quite understood the terminology, here is your lesson. Wonderful
character development, constant mood and intelligent direction are on display.
The audience is led to believe a certain world exists and for a moment (an hour
and a half or so) we believe it. We become involved in characters that
seem genuine and even enjoy the writing. The film usually has us thinking
things like, "this is different than other movies in this genre". We are
led through a story, eager to see what this unique film will present to us as a
conclusion. Then it comes and is just like every other film in the genre.
This could have really won me over with a clever ending, instead it was very
canned. For the ending alone, my rating dips to the bottom of a
recommendation. It is still entertaining and clever, but the ending is
unforgivable.
Jennifer M's Rating: A :
It has been quite a while since I've seen this movie, so I am going to
have to watch this again. I don't remember being disappointed with the ending.
Based on my initial viewing I would highly recommend the movie and found it very
enjoyable. I love seeing actors known for comedic roles in dramatic
performances. Steve C is excellent!
Angie's Rating: C : My favorite character in the movie was Annie. I
didn't really connect well with "Dan" maybe it's because he was so depressed all
of the time. I thought it was a pretty good picture of what a single dad would
be... not sugar coated, but come on. I was expecting some more clever dialog,
or a break in the clouds. I thought it was ok. I do agree with Scott and Jen.
The ending was like they totally ran out of time and or budget to write a decent
ending. I guess that is where I was most disappointed. The "break in the
clouds" could have been the ending, but it just wasn't for me. With a better
ending I would have given this movie a B.
Jen's Rating: B+ :
Well I completely agree with Scott. The ending is so disappointing.
The entire movie is excellent. I fell in love with the characters and even got
butterflies a few times because I felt so connected. Not that I think what
happened at the end is disappointing it's just how they did it that annoyed me.
It's seems as if they took their time and were very patient in making 90% of the
movie and then something came up and they needed to wrap it up quick. Anyway,
it's hard to give it a bad rating because I laughed several times and really
enjoyed the unique story. Steve is wonderful! Honestly the ending might not
bother some so I for sure recommend this movie.
Lori's Rating: C : I
was expecting a dry funny movie from Steve Corell. It was sad, slow and only
slightly funny. I was disappointed in this movie overall. It got it's point
across of what life can be like for a single, widowed dad, but not what I was
expecting from such a well known funny man.
Brian's
Rating: C : I am not a big fan of romantic comedies. I still see them from
time to time, and every once in awhile I hit on one I actually like. Going into
watching this movie, I only vaguely remembered Scott's review, and the bottom
line that he did not like it all that much. So I was completely surprised to
find that I was thoroughly enjoying this movie.
The humor was fresh, and circumstantial. I find myself laughing a whole lot
more with circumstantial humor rather than contrived funny scenes and
one-liners. This movie had a couple of these, but for the most part the humor
was built into the undertone of the characters and the situation that was
unfolding. I was smiling often, and laughing openly at regular intervals.
Along with that, the romance part of this comedy was blended in very well to the
story. Often in romantic comedies either the comedy, or the romance seems
forced into the writing. I was pleasantly surprised to find actual good writing
in this script.
A third point of this film I enjoyed was that of Steve Carell. Until now, I had
only seen him in the Daily Show--like Scott, I think he was awesome in that
role--and the hit sit-com "The Office". Both are similar character types, and
he pulls them off well. I was completely surprised to find that he also did a
great job of adapting to the role of a somewhat shy, quiet, and recovering
widowed dad.
Finally, I was enjoying this film because it actually presented some
originality. I have the same knock on most romantic comedies as I do with
procedural television shows. That is that they follow a strict canned formula.
Its almost as if there is a repository of Mad-Lib scripts that the writers dig
out and fill in the blanks for very predictable writing gimmicks. This movie
was breaking from the Mad Lib and actually presenting a provocative story.
I was all set to give this film a B+ (about as high as you'll ever see me rate a
romantic comedy), and then those last 10 minutes that Scott mentions in his
review hit you in the gut like a bad joke. After watching the movie, I went
back and read Scott's review and I completely agree with him on everything he
says. This movie smacks of Hollywood executives getting their muddy little
fingers on the script and forcing those last 10 minutes down your throat. Like
"I am Legend", this is enough to completely ruin the film and everything it had
going for it. I refuse to believe the writers actually wanted that ending, it
is completely asinine and forced. It did about as good of a job of fitting into
the rest of the script as if you would have thrown the ending of "The Godfather"
in. It makes me wonder if the creative writer behind this went home and shot
himself in the head after realizing what this would do to his reputation. I
don't need to spoil it, its like Scott says, canned. You could write it
yourself, and probably do it better. There are about 100 other directions they
could have taken it and it would have been better than what what presented.
I cannot, in good faith, recommend this to anyone because it is not realistic to
tell them to stop it 10 minutes before the end and write their own conclusion
instead. As it is, there is no alternate ending that I know of, and so anybody
watching this will have the misfortune of seeing the completely deflating final
10 minutes.
comment here
to add your review!